Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:35:08PM -0700, Dave Leskovec wrote:
>> Sorry - I should have mentioned that the two lxc patches I just posted are
>> built
>> on Dan B's patch. The order is this:
>>
>> Dan's patch
>
> commited,
>
>> lxc_start.patch
>
> reviewed
>
>> lxc
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 09:26:08AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:35:08PM -0700, Dave Leskovec wrote:
> > Sorry - I should have mentioned that the two lxc patches I just posted are
> > built
> > on Dan B's patch. The order is this:
> >
> > Dan's patch
>
> commited,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:35:08PM -0700, Dave Leskovec wrote:
> Sorry - I should have mentioned that the two lxc patches I just posted are
> built
> on Dan B's patch. The order is this:
>
> Dan's patch
commited,
> lxc_start.patch
reviewed
> lxc_stop.patch
reviewed
Now the next majo
Sorry - I should have mentioned that the two lxc patches I just posted are built
on Dan B's patch. The order is this:
Dan's patch
lxc_start.patch
lxc_stop.patch
Thanks!
--
Best Regards,
Dave Leskovec
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Virtualization
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redha
