Re: [Libvir] testing libvirtd: don't hard-code $HOME/.libvirt/libvirt-sock

2007-12-03 Thread Jim Meyering
"Richard W.M. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> I've written a test to exercise libvirtd a little. >> Unfortunately, if I'm already running libvirtd, that test fails >> and I can't do anything about it: >> >> $ ./libvirtd & ./libvirtd >> Failed to bind socket to '@/j/.

Re: [Libvir] testing libvirtd: don't hard-code $HOME/.libvirt/libvirt-sock

2007-12-03 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Jim Meyering wrote: I've written a test to exercise libvirtd a little. Unfortunately, if I'm already running libvirtd, that test fails and I can't do anything about it: $ ./libvirtd & ./libvirtd Failed to bind socket to '@/j/.libvirt/libvirt-sock': Address already in use [Exit 2] Any obje

[Libvir] testing libvirtd: don't hard-code $HOME/.libvirt/libvirt-sock

2007-12-03 Thread Jim Meyering
I've written a test to exercise libvirtd a little. Unfortunately, if I'm already running libvirtd, that test fails and I can't do anything about it: $ ./libvirtd & ./libvirtd Failed to bind socket to '@/j/.libvirt/libvirt-sock': Address already in use [Exit 2] Any objection to providing an