On 6/26/23 14:46, Christian Boltz wrote:
[Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to the mailinglist]
Hello,
regarding the initial patch in this thread: The patch looks good and
should go upstream IMHO. (Maybe except creating the dummy local/* files
for AppArmor 3.x - see below for details.)
A note
Hello,
Am Dienstag, 27. Juni 2023, 18:49:04 CEST schrieb Andrea Bolognani:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:46:40PM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:
[...]
> > See above - IMHO the current upstream behaviour is not perfect, and
> > will hopefully change to not creating the local/ files by default
> > in
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 06:27:10AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 03:25:49PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > On 6/23/23 07:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > The catch is that apparently the "include if exists" statement
> > > doesn't work well before 3.0, and our support
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 03:25:49PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On 6/23/23 07:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > The catch is that apparently the "include if exists" statement
> > doesn't work well before 3.0, and our support matrix will include
> > distros that are still on AppArmor 2.x for a couple
On 6/28/23 15:25, Jim Fehlig wrote:
On 6/23/23 07:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
The catch is that apparently the "include if exists" statement
doesn't work well before 3.0, and our support matrix will include
distros that are still on AppArmor 2.x for a couple more years :(
I'm working on a V2
On 6/23/23 07:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
The catch is that apparently the "include if exists" statement
doesn't work well before 3.0, and our support matrix will include
distros that are still on AppArmor 2.x for a couple more years :(
I'm working on a V2 of this patch and need help
On 6/27/23 11:28, Jim Fehlig wrote:
On 6/27/23 10:49, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:46:40PM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:
Am Montag, 26. Juni 2023, 18:29:11 CEST schrieb Andrea Bolognani:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 09:42:32AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Specifying which copy
On 6/27/23 10:49, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:46:40PM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:
Am Montag, 26. Juni 2023, 18:29:11 CEST schrieb Andrea Bolognani:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 09:42:32AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Specifying which copy to use via a build time option is also
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:46:40PM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Am Montag, 26. Juni 2023, 18:29:11 CEST schrieb Andrea Bolognani:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 09:42:32AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > > Specifying which copy to use via a build time option is also an
> > > option :-). Does your
[Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to the mailinglist]
Hello,
regarding the initial patch in this thread: The patch looks good and
should go upstream IMHO. (Maybe except creating the dummy local/* files
for AppArmor 3.x - see below for details.)
A note about what you mentioned in the patch
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 09:42:32AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On 6/26/23 03:52, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 11:31:04AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > > On 6/23/23 07:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > > However, not only you've added a few such statements in your recent
> > >
On 6/26/23 03:52, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 11:31:04AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
On 6/23/23 07:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
However, not only you've added a few such statements in your recent
commit 9b743ee19053, but I myself have done the same a couple months
back with
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 11:31:04AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On 6/23/23 07:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > However, not only you've added a few such statements in your recent
> > commit 9b743ee19053, but I myself have done the same a couple months
> > back with commit 7a39b04d683f, as part of
On 6/23/23 07:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 03:03:56PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
On 6/22/23 11:08, Jim Fehlig wrote:
On 6/22/23 08:50, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 10:37:43AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
I assumed users would make VM customizations in the
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 03:03:56PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On 6/22/23 11:08, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > On 6/22/23 08:50, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 10:37:43AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > > > I assumed users would make VM customizations in the per-VM profiles.
> > > >
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 7:11 PM Jim Fehlig wrote:
>
> On 6/22/23 08:50, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 10:37:43AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> >> On 6/8/23 08:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> >>> Note that the Debian package has included this patch[1] for many
> >>> years, and
On 6/22/23 11:08, Jim Fehlig wrote:
On 6/22/23 08:50, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 10:37:43AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
On 6/8/23 08:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
Note that the Debian package has included this patch[1] for many
years, and while it partially overlaps with what
On 6/22/23 08:50, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 10:37:43AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
On 6/8/23 08:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
Note that the Debian package has included this patch[1] for many
years, and while it partially overlaps with what you've added here, I
see that local
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 10:37:43AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On 6/8/23 08:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Note that the Debian package has included this patch[1] for many
> > years, and while it partially overlaps with what you've added here, I
> > see that local overrides for abstractions are
On 6/8/23 08:11, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:06:12PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Apparmor profiles in /etc/apparmor.d/ are config files that can and should
be replaced on package upgrade, which introduces the potential to overwrite
any local changes. Apparmor supports local
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:06:12PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Apparmor profiles in /etc/apparmor.d/ are config files that can and should
> be replaced on package upgrade, which introduces the potential to overwrite
> any local changes. Apparmor supports local profile customizations via
>
On 6/7/23 00:06, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Apparmor profiles in /etc/apparmor.d/ are config files that can and should
> be replaced on package upgrade, which introduces the potential to overwrite
> any local changes. Apparmor supports local profile customizations via
> /etc/apparmor.d/local/ [1].
>
>
Apparmor profiles in /etc/apparmor.d/ are config files that can and should
be replaced on package upgrade, which introduces the potential to overwrite
any local changes. Apparmor supports local profile customizations via
/etc/apparmor.d/local/ [1].
This change makes the support explicit by adding
23 matches
Mail list logo
