Re: [PATCH] conf, schema: Switch iothread/poll values to unsignedLong

2023-09-04 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 09:22:54AM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 23:32:14 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: They represent nanoseconds, and we accept such values already. Not that anyone would use such values in the wild, but even one person testing QEMU could put in a

Re: [PATCH] conf, schema: Switch iothread/poll values to unsignedLong

2023-09-04 Thread Peter Krempa
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 23:32:14 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > They represent nanoseconds, and we accept such values already. Not that > anyone would use such values in the wild, but even one person testing > QEMU could put in a bigger value and will be bothered with validation > errors after

[PATCH] conf, schema: Switch iothread/poll values to unsignedLong

2023-09-01 Thread Martin Kletzander
They represent nanoseconds, and we accept such values already. Not that anyone would use such values in the wild, but even one person testing QEMU could put in a bigger value and will be bothered with validation errors after every `virsh edit`. Also add a test for it. Resolves: