On 2023/1/6 17:42, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> The ping for this patch got threaded weirdly, so I just stumbled upon
> this now.
>
> The subject could use s/with/against/ or could be something like "Limit
> the number of vhost-user queues to the number of vcpus", but a question
> below.
>
> On
The ping for this patch got threaded weirdly, so I just stumbled upon
this now.
The subject could use s/with/against/ or could be something like "Limit
the number of vhost-user queues to the number of vcpus", but a question
below.
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:52:19PM +0800, Jiang Jiacheng wrote:
Ping...
On 2022/12/8 20:49, Jiang Jiacheng wrote:
> With kernel without the ref patch, if queues > vcpus, interrupts
> will be centralized on one vcpu affecting guest performance. After
> the ref patch merged, the queues whose number is greater than the
> number of vcpus will not be used.
>
> Con
With kernel without the ref patch, if queues > vcpus, interrupts
will be centralized on one vcpu affecting guest performance. After
the ref patch merged, the queues whose number is greater than the
number of vcpus will not be used.
Considering the above, it's better to check the counts of vhost-us
