On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:21:46PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:47:36AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > The sentence explaining the deprecation schedule is ambiguous. Make it
> > clear that a feature deprecated in the Nth release is guaranteed to
> > remain
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 at 15:22, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> So we're changing
>
> The feature will remain functional for 2 releases prior to actual removal.
>
> to
>
> The feature will remain functional for 1 more release after deprecation.
>
> How about
>
> The feature will remain functional
On 9/14/20 9:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:47:36AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
The sentence explaining the deprecation schedule is ambiguous. Make it
clear that a feature deprecated in the Nth release is guaranteed to
remain available in the N+1th release.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:47:36AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The sentence explaining the deprecation schedule is ambiguous. Make it
> clear that a feature deprecated in the Nth release is guaranteed to
> remain available in the N+1th release. Removal can occur in the N+2nd
> release or
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:47:36AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The sentence explaining the deprecation schedule is ambiguous. Make it
> clear that a feature deprecated in the Nth release is guaranteed to
> remain available in the N+1th release. Removal can occur in the N+2nd
> release or
The sentence explaining the deprecation schedule is ambiguous. Make it
clear that a feature deprecated in the Nth release is guaranteed to
remain available in the N+1th release. Removal can occur in the N+2nd
release or later.
As an example of this in action, see commit
