On 4/16/20 2:21 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 11:46 +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
On 4/15/20 6:38 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
The idea behind it was to show users that they shouldn't expect the
address in the domain XML to match the one in the guest OS, with a
few
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 11:46 +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> On 4/15/20 6:38 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > The idea behind it was to show users that they shouldn't expect the
> > address in the domain XML to match the one in the guest OS, with a
> > few real-life examples to illustrate the
On 4/15/20 6:38 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 16:45 +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:23:46 +0200
Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
Once I understand you confusion above I will provide a patch...
I'd say just go ahead.
While I appreciate the sentiment, I would
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 12:51 +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Add some information on how pci address work on s390x.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
> ---
> docs/pci-addresses.rst | 63 ++
> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
There are a few comments that I
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:38:06 +0200
Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 16:45 +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:23:46 +0200
> > Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> > > Once I understand you confusion above I will provide a patch...
> >
> > I'd say just go ahead.
>
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 16:45 +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:23:46 +0200
> Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> > Once I understand you confusion above I will provide a patch...
>
> I'd say just go ahead.
While I appreciate the sentiment, I would rather not have an
excessive amount of
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:23:46 +0200
Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> On 4/15/20 3:42 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 23:06:47 +0200
> > Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/15/20 12:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> +In the simplest case, the following XML snippet
> >>> +
> >>>
On 4/15/20 3:42 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 23:06:47 +0200
Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
On 4/15/20 12:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
+zPCI addresses
+==
+
+For s390x machines, PCI addresses are handled yet differently. No
+topology information is relayed in the PCI
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 23:06:47 +0200
Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> On 4/15/20 12:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > +zPCI addresses
> > +==
> > +
> > +For s390x machines, PCI addresses are handled yet differently. No
> > +topology information is relayed in the PCI addresses; instead, the
> >
Sorry about the time travel.
I will try to give up that super power... :(
On 4/14/20 11:06 PM, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
On 4/15/20 12:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
Add some information on how pci address work on s390x.
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
Conny, thanks for catching this "wacky
On 4/15/20 12:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
Add some information on how pci address work on s390x.
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
Conny, thanks for catching this "wacky case"... :)
I took the liberty to remove "completely" because there needs to be room
for pci multifunction support... :D
---
On a Wednesday in 2020, Cornelia Huck wrote:
Add some information on how pci address work on s390x.
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
---
docs/pci-addresses.rst | 63 ++
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/pci-addresses.rst
Add some information on how pci address work on s390x.
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
---
docs/pci-addresses.rst | 63 ++
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/pci-addresses.rst b/docs/pci-addresses.rst
index 923783a151b0..9e241a24fcfb 100644
13 matches
Mail list logo
