Re: [PATCH] kbase: Document minimal libvirt version for NUMA-less virtiofs

2020-11-13 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 11/12/20 10:22 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: On 11/12/20 6:04 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote: Using virtiofs without NUMA was implemented in v6.9.0-rc1~161 but our kbase document only mentions QEMU version which may confuse users. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik --- This is related to

Re: [PATCH] kbase: Document minimal libvirt version for NUMA-less virtiofs

2020-11-12 Thread Daniel Henrique Barboza
On 11/12/20 6:04 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote: Using virtiofs without NUMA was implemented in v6.9.0-rc1~161 but our kbase document only mentions QEMU version which may confuse users. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik --- This is related to the IRC question just now? I've read it and wondered

[PATCH] kbase: Document minimal libvirt version for NUMA-less virtiofs

2020-11-12 Thread Michal Privoznik
Using virtiofs without NUMA was implemented in v6.9.0-rc1~161 but our kbase document only mentions QEMU version which may confuse users. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik --- docs/kbase/virtiofs.rst | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/kbase/virtiofs.rst