Hi Ian,
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 09:48 +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 06:38:04AM +, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > The check didn't involve any NetworkManager at all, but a network with
> > RA route for the default route. Completely removing the check is rather
> > likely to
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 06:38:04AM +, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> The check didn't involve any NetworkManager at all, but a network with
> RA route for the default route. Completely removing the check is rather
> likely to introduce a regression on that side.
Thanks for putting up with my
On 9/9/20 2:38 AM, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 12:39 +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 08:27:47AM +, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
So the hypervisor has at least one (Router Advertised) RA route.
After defining a network like the following, the RA route is
On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 12:39 +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 08:27:47AM +, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > So the hypervisor has at least one (Router Advertised) RA route.
> > After defining a network like the following, the RA route is removed if
> > accept_ra isn't set to 2.
>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 08:27:47AM +, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> So the hypervisor has at least one (Router Advertised) RA route.
> After defining a network like the following, the RA route is removed if
> accept_ra isn't set to 2.
>
>
> test5
>
>
>
> family="ipv6"
>
On Wed, 2020-08-12 at 19:21 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> Yay! A user who follows up their conversation on the libvirt-users list
> with a patch! :-)
>
> On 8/11/20 8:14 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
> > The checks modified here were added with
> > 00d28a78b5d1f6eaf79f06ac59e31c568af9da37 to avoid losing
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 07:21:14PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> Yay! A user who follows up their conversation on the libvirt-users list with
> a patch! :-)
Heh, ipv6 in my work VM is my white whale, so, call me Ishmael :)
> Unfortunately, on my Fedora 32 machine that has NetworkManager enabled,
Yay! A user who follows up their conversation on the libvirt-users list
with a patch! :-)
On 8/11/20 8:14 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
The checks modified here were added with
00d28a78b5d1f6eaf79f06ac59e31c568af9da37 to avoid losing routes on
hosts.
I'm Cc'ing the author of that patch, Cédric
The checks modified here were added with
00d28a78b5d1f6eaf79f06ac59e31c568af9da37 to avoid losing routes on
hosts.
However, tools such as systemd-networking and NetworkManager manage
RA's in userspace and thus IPv6 may be up and working on an interface
even with accept_ra == 0.
This modifies the
