Re: [PATCH 1/1] manpages/virsh.rst: clarify numatune memory migration on Linux

2020-06-16 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 10:32 -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > On 6/16/20 9:09 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > I've tweaked the formatting for the manpage and commit message ever > > so slightly, added a reference to > > > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640869 > > > > and

Re: [PATCH 1/1] manpages/virsh.rst: clarify numatune memory migration on Linux

2020-06-16 Thread Daniel Henrique Barboza
On 6/16/20 9:09 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote: On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 14:00 -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: On Linux, changing the nodeset on 'numatune' does not imply that the guest memory will be migrated on the spot to the new nodeset. The memory migration is tied on guest usage of the m

Re: [PATCH 1/1] manpages/virsh.rst: clarify numatune memory migration on Linux

2020-06-16 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 14:00 -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > On Linux, changing the nodeset on 'numatune' does not imply that > the guest memory will be migrated on the spot to the new nodeset. > The memory migration is tied on guest usage of the memory pages, > and an idle guest will take l

[PATCH 1/1] manpages/virsh.rst: clarify numatune memory migration on Linux

2020-06-11 Thread Daniel Henrique Barboza
On Linux, changing the nodeset on 'numatune' does not imply that the guest memory will be migrated on the spot to the new nodeset. The memory migration is tied on guest usage of the memory pages, and an idle guest will take longer to have its memory migrated to the new nodeset. This is a behavior