On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 15:16:54 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 02:57:09PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > On a Thursday in 2023, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > VIR_WARN of a misconfiguration of a VM is not really going to be seen in
> > > most cases as it's simply logged, and
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 02:57:09PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On a Thursday in 2023, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > VIR_WARN of a misconfiguration of a VM is not really going to be seen in
> > most cases as it's simply logged, and if the VM works users are not
> > likely to dig through logs.
>
> Should
On a Thursday in 2023, Peter Krempa wrote:
VIR_WARN of a misconfiguration of a VM is not really going to be seen in
most cases as it's simply logged, and if the VM works users are not
likely to dig through logs.
Should we put it under VIR_DOMAIN_START_WERROR? :)
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa
VIR_WARN of a misconfiguration of a VM is not really going to be seen in
most cases as it's simply logged, and if the VM works users are not
likely to dig through logs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa
---
src/qemu/qemu_validate.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
