On 9/10/20 11:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 04:48:01PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
The existing auto-align behavior for pSeries has the idea to
alleviate user configuration of the NVDIMM size, given that the
alignment calculation is not trivial to do (256M
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 04:48:01PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> The existing auto-align behavior for pSeries has the idea to
> alleviate user configuration of the NVDIMM size, given that the
> alignment calculation is not trivial to do (256MiB alignment
> of mem->size - mem->label_size v
On 8/24/20 1:44 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 7/30/20 9:48 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
The existing auto-align behavior for pSeries has the idea to
alleviate user configuration of the NVDIMM size, given that the
alignment calculation is not trivial to do (256MiB alignment
of mem->size
On 7/30/20 9:48 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
The existing auto-align behavior for pSeries has the idea to
alleviate user configuration of the NVDIMM size, given that the
alignment calculation is not trivial to do (256MiB alignment
of mem->size - mem->label_size value, a.k.a guest area). We
The existing auto-align behavior for pSeries has the idea to
alleviate user configuration of the NVDIMM size, given that the
alignment calculation is not trivial to do (256MiB alignment
of mem->size - mem->label_size value, a.k.a guest area). We
align mem->size down to avoid end of file problems.
