On 12/8/20 4:58 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 12/8/20 6:45 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 12/8/20 7:22 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
But since we are splitting parsing and validation code can we use this chance
and move validators out of domain_conf.c allowing it to be smaller
On 12/8/20 6:45 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 12/8/20 7:22 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
But since we are splitting parsing and validation code can we use this
chance and move validators out of domain_conf.c allowing it to be
smaller in size?
Makes sense. I can create a
On 12/8/20 7:22 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 12/7/20 2:54 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Hi,
This is the respin of [1] after the reviews from Michal.
Although we're pushing code to validate callbacks instead of
post parse functions, the idea and motivation is still in line
with [2].
On 12/7/20 2:54 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Hi,
This is the respin of [1] after the reviews from Michal.
Although we're pushing code to validate callbacks instead of
post parse functions, the idea and motivation is still in line
with [2].
[1]
Hi,
This is the respin of [1] after the reviews from Michal.
Although we're pushing code to validate callbacks instead of
post parse functions, the idea and motivation is still in line
with [2].
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2020-November/msg01409.html
[2]
