Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] qemu: check if s390 secure guest support is enabled

2020-06-16 Thread Boris Fiuczynski
On 6/15/20 5:51 PM, Erik Skultety wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:49:30PM +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: On 6/15/20 4:17 PM, Erik Skultety wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:28:07AM +0200, Paulo de Rezende Pinatti wrote: This patch introduces a common function to verify if the availability of

Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] qemu: check if s390 secure guest support is enabled

2020-06-15 Thread Erik Skultety
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:49:30PM +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: > On 6/15/20 4:17 PM, Erik Skultety wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:28:07AM +0200, Paulo de Rezende Pinatti wrote: > > > This patch introduces a common function to verify if the > > > availability of the so-called Secure Guest

Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] qemu: check if s390 secure guest support is enabled

2020-06-15 Thread Boris Fiuczynski
On 6/15/20 4:17 PM, Erik Skultety wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:28:07AM +0200, Paulo de Rezende Pinatti wrote: This patch introduces a common function to verify if the availability of the so-called Secure Guest feature on the host has changed in order to invalidate the qemu capabilities cach

Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] qemu: check if s390 secure guest support is enabled

2020-06-15 Thread Erik Skultety
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:28:07AM +0200, Paulo de Rezende Pinatti wrote: > This patch introduces a common function to verify if the > availability of the so-called Secure Guest feature on the host > has changed in order to invalidate the qemu capabilities cache. > It can be used as an entry point

[PATCH v3 2/7] qemu: check if s390 secure guest support is enabled

2020-06-15 Thread Paulo de Rezende Pinatti
This patch introduces a common function to verify if the availability of the so-called Secure Guest feature on the host has changed in order to invalidate the qemu capabilities cache. It can be used as an entry point for verification on different architectures. For s390 the verification consists o