[ Sending again since my outgoing mail was down yesterday :-( ]
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This is a followup to
>
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-September/msg00477.html
>
> I am not actually going to spam the list with all the patc
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This is a followup to
>
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-September/msg00477.html
>
> I am not actually going to spam the list with all the patches, since
> it'd generate a HUGE series of mails.
>
> Instead I
2009/9/16 Daniel P. Berrange :
> This is a followup to
>
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-September/msg00477.html
>
> I am not actually going to spam the list with all the patches, since
> it'd generate a HUGE series of mails.
>
> Instead I have published a branch containing all t
This is a followup to
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-September/msg00477.html
I am not actually going to spam the list with all the patches, since
it'd generate a HUGE series of mails.
Instead I have published a branch containing all the patches which you
can directly pull into
