On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:23:51PM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
> I should say here I don't intend to replace using numeric uid/gid
> with using alphabetical names. This patch intends just to bring
> ease of use and identifying what is specified for users (may not
> for end-users though). And I don't
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:23:51PM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch set allows alphabetical names in owner/group of permissions
> in storage XMLs.
>
> Change from the initial patch:
> - store owner/group as strings
> - As a result, dumpxml of StoragePool could return XML as it is
Hi,
This patch set allows alphabetical names in owner/group of permissions
in storage XMLs.
Change from the initial patch:
- store owner/group as strings
- As a result, dumpxml of StoragePool could return XML as it is
specified
Note that in the case of StorageVolume, dumpxml always returns
