Thank you for picking this up !
I've got a question: I want to change the link device's MAC address
prior to starting the VM, and I want to re-set the MAC to it's original
value afterwards.
Setting the MAC in the IF is no issue, but is it ok if I add a MAC
variable to
the direct structure in vi
On 05/18/2011 05:32 AM, D. Herrendoerfer wrote:
destination
device is in private mode.
+ passthru
+ This feature allows to attach a virtual function of a SRIOV
capable
>>>
>> That patch looks fine to me, ACK,
>> The only unresolved uncertainty to me is what
On May 18, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 08:19:17PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/17/2011 05:26 AM, D. Herrendoerfer wrote:
This patch includes the documentation part.
The error returned by libvirt when a using an older kernel
is imho sufficient to point
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 08:19:17PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 05:26 AM, D. Herrendoerfer wrote:
> > This patch includes the documentation part.
> >
> > The error returned by libvirt when a using an older kernel
> > is imho sufficient to point to the macvtap setup. Apart from that
> >
On 05/17/2011 05:26 AM, D. Herrendoerfer wrote:
> This patch includes the documentation part.
>
> The error returned by libvirt when a using an older kernel
> is imho sufficient to point to the macvtap setup. Apart from that
> I doubt that someone will use this feature by chance. But still - I
> b
On May 11, 2011, at 12:21 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Missing corresponding documentation in docs/formatdomain.html.in to
describe the new mode.
What happens if you try to use this mode but you have an older kernel?
Do we need to add any sanity checking to give a saner error message
than
just blin
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:46:55AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 05/11/2011 08:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:21:29PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> >>On 05/10/2011 05:59 AM, D. Herrendoerfer wrote:
> >>>Hi all,
> >>>
> >>>starting with kernel 2.6.38 macvtap supports a
On 05/11/2011 08:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:21:29PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/10/2011 05:59 AM, D. Herrendoerfer wrote:
Hi all,
starting with kernel 2.6.38 macvtap supports a 'passthru' mode for
attaching virtual functions
of a SRIOV capable network card d
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:21:29PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/10/2011 05:59 AM, D. Herrendoerfer wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > starting with kernel 2.6.38 macvtap supports a 'passthru' mode for
> > attaching virtual functions
> > of a SRIOV capable network card directly to a VM.
> > This patch
On 05/10/2011 05:59 AM, D. Herrendoerfer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> starting with kernel 2.6.38 macvtap supports a 'passthru' mode for
> attaching virtual functions
> of a SRIOV capable network card directly to a VM.
> This patch adds the capability to configure such a device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk H
Hi all,
starting with kernel 2.6.38 macvtap supports a 'passthru' mode for
attaching virtual functions
of a SRIOV capable network card directly to a VM.
This patch adds the capability to configure such a device.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Herrendoerfer herrendoerfer.name>
diff --git a/docs/schemas
11 matches
Mail list logo
