On 10/7/2010 7:20 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:04:11AM +0530, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
>> This patch introduces new attribute to filesystem element
>> to support customizable security_model for mount type.
>> Valid security_model are: passthrough, mapped and none.
>>
>>
On 10/7/2010 5:13 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 10:17 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:04:11AM +0530, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
>>> This patch introduces new attribute to filesystem element
>>> to support customizable security_model for mount type.
>>> Valid sec
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:04:11AM +0530, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
> This patch introduces new attribute to filesystem element
> to support customizable security_model for mount type.
> Valid security_model are: passthrough, mapped and none.
>
> Usage:
>
>
>
>
Well,
On 10/07/2010 10:17 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:04:11AM +0530, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
This patch introduces new attribute to filesystem element
to support customizable security_model for mount type.
Valid security_model are: passthrough, mapped and none.
Usage:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:04:11AM +0530, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
> This patch introduces new attribute to filesystem element
> to support customizable security_model for mount type.
> Valid security_model are: passthrough, mapped and none.
>
> Usage:
>
I'd like to think of a different n
This patch introduces new attribute to filesystem element
to support customizable security_model for mount type.
Valid security_model are: passthrough, mapped and none.
Usage:
Note: This patch is based on Daniel's patch to support 9pfs.
It shall be applied afte
