On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 03:44:03PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 02:27:31PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> > > Allow no for bridge interfaces
> > >
> > > Historically, it was allowed to specify a bridge interface without a
> > > specific bridge source, in which case xe
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 02:27:31PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Allow no for bridge interfaces
> >
> > Historically, it was allowed to specify a bridge interface without a
> > specific bridge source, in which case xend would choose one. Keep
> > compatible with this behaviour.
>
> ACK i
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:01:50AM -0800, john.le...@sun.com wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User john.le...@sun.com
> # Date 1233586907 28800
> # Node ID 68087e3caf39c74797720bde71a8df524ec036c8
> # Parent aa50ca252e1419f30eb0e16204b48db42d92c785
> Allow no for bridge interfaces
>
> Historica
# HG changeset patch
# User john.le...@sun.com
# Date 1233586907 28800
# Node ID 68087e3caf39c74797720bde71a8df524ec036c8
# Parent aa50ca252e1419f30eb0e16204b48db42d92c785
Allow no for bridge interfaces
Historically, it was allowed to specify a bridge interface without a
specific bridge source,