On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:09:38PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:37:46PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Hum, I'm not sure I follow, you would like to create a metadata
container at the top level and put description in it ? The problem
is that I don't see what
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523639
feature request which makes sense to me, the simple patch attached
seems to be sufficient, one can define and have the description back
in the dump. Doesn't try to keep the location of the tag, it always
get serialized after uuid.
The only
2009/9/30 Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523639
feature request which makes sense to me, the simple patch attached
seems to be sufficient, one can define and have the description back
in the dump. Doesn't try to keep the location of the tag,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:49:05PM +0200, Matthias Bolte wrote:
2009/9/30 Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523639
feature request which makes sense to me, the simple patch attached
seems to be sufficient, one can define and have the
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:58:07PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523639
feature request which makes sense to me, the simple patch attached
seems to be sufficient, one can define and have the description back
in the dump. Doesn't try to keep the
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:49:05PM +0200, Matthias Bolte wrote:
2009/9/30 Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523639
feature request which makes sense to me, the simple patch attached
seems to be sufficient, one can define and have the
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:22:43PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:49:05PM +0200, Matthias Bolte wrote:
2009/9/30 Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523639
feature request which makes sense to me, the simple
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:37:46PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:22:43PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:49:05PM +0200, Matthias Bolte wrote:
2009/9/30 Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 14:58 +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523639
feature request which makes sense to me, the simple patch attached
seems to be sufficient, one can define and have the description back
in the dump. Doesn't try to keep the location
