On 10/05/2012 08:42 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/05/2012 07:05 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> Currently, we are checking if libvirt.so contains public symbols.
>> However, sometimes we rename an internal symbol and forget to
>> change libvirt_private.syms accordingly. Hence, it's safer to check
>>
On 10/05/2012 07:05 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Currently, we are checking if libvirt.so contains public symbols.
> However, sometimes we rename an internal symbol and forget to
> change libvirt_private.syms accordingly. Hence, it's safer to check
> for internal symbols as well.
> ---
> src/Make
On 05.10.2012 15:13, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/05/2012 07:05 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> Currently, we are checking if libvirt.so contains public symbols.
>> However, sometimes we rename an internal symbol and forget to
>> change libvirt_private.syms accordingly. Hence, it's safer to check
>> fo
On 10/05/2012 07:05 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Currently, we are checking if libvirt.so contains public symbols.
> However, sometimes we rename an internal symbol and forget to
> change libvirt_private.syms accordingly. Hence, it's safer to check
> for internal symbols as well.
> ---
> src/Make
Currently, we are checking if libvirt.so contains public symbols.
However, sometimes we rename an internal symbol and forget to
change libvirt_private.syms accordingly. Hence, it's safer to check
for internal symbols as well.
---
src/Makefile.am |7 ++-
src/check-symfile.pl |2 +-
