On 30.09.2016 14:22, Nehal J Wani wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 28.09.2016 21:39, Nehal J Wani wrote:
>>> Libvirt, on its own, shouldn't decide whether an expired lease should
>>> stay in the custom leases database or not. It should rather rely on
>>> the
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 28.09.2016 21:39, Nehal J Wani wrote:
>> Libvirt, on its own, shouldn't decide whether an expired lease should
>> stay in the custom leases database or not. It should rather rely on
>> the 'DEL' event from dnsmasq.
>> ---
>> src/util/v
On 28.09.2016 21:39, Nehal J Wani wrote:
> Libvirt, on its own, shouldn't decide whether an expired lease should
> stay in the custom leases database or not. It should rather rely on
> the 'DEL' event from dnsmasq.
> ---
> src/util/virlease.c | 8
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> dif
Libvirt, on its own, shouldn't decide whether an expired lease should
stay in the custom leases database or not. It should rather rely on
the 'DEL' event from dnsmasq.
---
src/util/virlease.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virlease.c b/src/util/virlease.c
index