Il 03/05/2013 06:12, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
The F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC operation with fcntl() expects a single
int argument, specifying the minimum FD number for the newly
dup'd file descriptor. We were not specifying that causing
random stack
On 06/11/2013 10:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/05/2013 06:12, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
The F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC operation with fcntl() expects a single
int argument, specifying the minimum FD number for the newly
dup'd file descriptor. We
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
The F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC operation with fcntl() expects a single
int argument, specifying the minimum FD number for the newly
dup'd file descriptor. We were not specifying that causing
random stack data to be accessed as the FD number. Sometimes
that
On 05/03/2013 04:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
The F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC operation with fcntl() expects a single
int argument, specifying the minimum FD number for the newly
dup'd file descriptor. We were not specifying that causing
random stack
On 05/03/2013 06:06 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/03/2013 04:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
The F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC operation with fcntl() expects a single
int argument, specifying the minimum FD number for the newly
dup'd file descriptor. We were not