On 05/18/2011 10:03 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 03:47 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> This error code has existed since the dawn of time, yet the messages it
>> generates are almost universally busted. Here's a small sampling:
>>
>> src/conf/domain_conf.c:4889 : XML description for missing ro
On 05/12/2011 03:47 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
> This error code has existed since the dawn of time, yet the messages it
> generates are almost universally busted. Here's a small sampling:
>
> src/conf/domain_conf.c:4889 : XML description for missing root element is not
> well formed or invalid
> s
On 18.05.2011 15:41, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 05/13/2011 08:35 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote:
>> On 05/12/2011 11:47 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>> This error code has existed since the dawn of time, yet the messages it
>>> generates are almost universally busted. Here's a small sampling:
>>>
>>> src/c
On 05/13/2011 08:35 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 11:47 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> This error code has existed since the dawn of time, yet the messages it
>> generates are almost universally busted. Here's a small sampling:
>>
>> src/conf/domain_conf.c:4889 : XML description for miss
On 05/12/2011 11:47 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
> This error code has existed since the dawn of time, yet the messages it
> generates are almost universally busted. Here's a small sampling:
>
> src/conf/domain_conf.c:4889 : XML description for missing root element is not
> well formed or invalid
> s
This error code has existed since the dawn of time, yet the messages it
generates are almost universally busted. Here's a small sampling:
src/conf/domain_conf.c:4889 : XML description for missing root element is not
well formed or invalid
src/conf/domain_conf.c:4951 : XML description for unknown
