On 08/13/2013 04:20 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/09/2013 03:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Anyway, why I'm saying this is that one more filename should be renamed
in order to avoid a race (which I was unable to reproduce, though).
I have reproduced the race.
ACK, yes this is also
On 08/09/2013 03:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Anyway, why I'm saying this is that one more filename should be renamed
in order to avoid a race (which I was unable to reproduce, though).
I have reproduced the race.
ACK, yes this is also needed ontop of my patch.
I went ahead and
On 08/09/2013 12:29 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/08/2013 04:09 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Use a seperate keyfile name for the two TLS test suites so that
s/seperate/separate/
they don't clash when running tests in parallel
Signed-off-by:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:53:30AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 08/09/2013 12:29 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/08/2013 04:09 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Use a seperate keyfile name for the two TLS test suites so that
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Use a seperate keyfile name for the two TLS test suites so that
they don't clash when running tests in parallel
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
---
tests/virnettlscontexttest.c | 10 ++
tests/virnettlshelpers.c | 6
On 08/08/2013 04:09 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Use a seperate keyfile name for the two TLS test suites so that
s/seperate/separate/
they don't clash when running tests in parallel
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
---
