On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
>
> Patch seems reasonable to me, and there's been a handful of complains about
> that bug. Can you tweak it a bit and resend?
Of course. I'll get this out later tonight or tomorrow.
Dusty
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
h
On 09/20/2013 10:38 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> For BZ 924672 the problem stems from the fact that thin pool logical
> volume devices show up in /sbin/lvs output just like normal logical
> volumes do. Since the thin pool devices show up libvirt assumes they are
> just normal logical volumes and assu
For BZ 924672 the problem stems from the fact that thin pool logical
volume devices show up in /sbin/lvs output just like normal logical
volumes do. Since the thin pool devices show up libvirt assumes they are
just normal logical volumes and assumes there will be a corresponding
/dev/vgname/lvname