Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Ignore thin pool LVM devices

2013-10-08 Thread Dusty Mabe
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: > > Patch seems reasonable to me, and there's been a handful of complains about > that bug. Can you tweak it a bit and resend? Of course. I'll get this out later tonight or tomorrow. Dusty -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com h

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Ignore thin pool LVM devices

2013-10-08 Thread Cole Robinson
On 09/20/2013 10:38 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > For BZ 924672 the problem stems from the fact that thin pool logical > volume devices show up in /sbin/lvs output just like normal logical > volumes do. Since the thin pool devices show up libvirt assumes they are > just normal logical volumes and assu

[libvirt] [PATCH] Ignore thin pool LVM devices

2013-09-20 Thread Dusty Mabe
For BZ 924672 the problem stems from the fact that thin pool logical volume devices show up in /sbin/lvs output just like normal logical volumes do. Since the thin pool devices show up libvirt assumes they are just normal logical volumes and assumes there will be a corresponding /dev/vgname/lvname