On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 07:34:04PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:55:04PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Linux still defaults to a 1024 open file handle limit. This causes
> > scalability problems for libvirtd / virtlockd / virtlogd on large
> > hosts which mig
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:55:04PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Linux still defaults to a 1024 open file handle limit. This causes
> scalability problems for libvirtd / virtlockd / virtlogd on large
> hosts which might want > 1024 guest to be running. In fact if each
> guest needs > 1 FD,
On 03/15/2017 12:55 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Linux still defaults to a 1024 open file handle limit. This causes
> scalability problems for libvirtd / virtlockd / virtlogd on large
> hosts which might want > 1024 guest to be running. In fact if each
> guest needs > 1 FD, we can't even get to
Linux still defaults to a 1024 open file handle limit. This causes
scalability problems for libvirtd / virtlockd / virtlogd on large
hosts which might want > 1024 guest to be running. In fact if each
guest needs > 1 FD, we can't even get to 500 guests. This is not
good enough when we see machines w