On 01/04/2011 11:14 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
Although the upper-layer code protected against it, it was possible to
call iptablesForwardMasquerade() with an IPv6 address and have it
attempt to add a rule to the MASQUERADE chain of ip6tables (which
doesn't exist).
This patch changes that
On 01/05/2011 11:28 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/04/2011 11:14 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
Although the upper-layer code protected against it, it was possible to
call iptablesForwardMasquerade() with an IPv6 address and have it
attempt to add a rule to the MASQUERADE chain of ip6tables (which
doesn't
Although the upper-layer code protected against it, it was possible to
call iptablesForwardMasquerade() with an IPv6 address and have it
attempt to add a rule to the MASQUERADE chain of ip6tables (which
doesn't exist).
This patch changes that function to check the protocol of the given
address,