Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Mark defined networks as persistent

2009-03-02 Thread Jim Meyering
Cole Robinson wrote: We aren't setting the persistent bit when a network is defined, so 'destroy' makes them disappear (though they will reappear later since their persistent config is never removed). Attached patch fixes this. Hi Cole, Looks like you're on the right track. My reflex was to

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Mark defined networks as persistent

2009-03-02 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering wrote: Cole Robinson wrote: We aren't setting the persistent bit when a network is defined, so 'destroy' makes them disappear (though they will reappear later since their persistent config is never removed). Attached patch fixes this. Hi Cole, Looks like you're on the right

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Mark defined networks as persistent

2009-03-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:57:20AM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote: We aren't setting the persistent bit when a network is defined, so 'destroy' makes them disappear (though they will reappear later since their persistent config is never removed). Attached patch fixes this. ACK Daniel -- |:

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Mark defined networks as persistent

2009-03-02 Thread Cole Robinson
Cole Robinson wrote: We aren't setting the persistent bit when a network is defined, so 'destroy' makes them disappear (though they will reappear later since their persistent config is never removed). Committed now. Thanks, Cole -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com

[libvirt] [PATCH] Mark defined networks as persistent

2009-02-27 Thread Cole Robinson
We aren't setting the persistent bit when a network is defined, so 'destroy' makes them disappear (though they will reappear later since their persistent config is never removed). Attached patch fixes this. Thanks, Cole Mark 'defined' networks as persistent. diff --git a/src/network_conf.c