Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Promote storage pool refresh lifecycle event to top level event

2016-06-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 01:12:40PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 06/24/2016 12:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > The VIR_STORAGE_POOL_EVENT_REFRESHED constant does not > > reflect any change in the lifecycle of the storage pool. > > > > It should thus not be part of the storage pool

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Promote storage pool refresh lifecycle event to top level event

2016-06-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 01:12:40PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 06/24/2016 12:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > The VIR_STORAGE_POOL_EVENT_REFRESHED constant does not > > reflect any change in the lifecycle of the storage pool. > > > > It should thus not be part of the storage pool

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Promote storage pool refresh lifecycle event to top level event

2016-06-24 Thread Cole Robinson
On 06/24/2016 12:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > The VIR_STORAGE_POOL_EVENT_REFRESHED constant does not > reflect any change in the lifecycle of the storage pool. > > It should thus not be part of the storage pool lifecycle > event set, but rather be a top level event in its own > right. Thus

[libvirt] [PATCH] Promote storage pool refresh lifecycle event to top level event

2016-06-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
The VIR_STORAGE_POOL_EVENT_REFRESHED constant does not reflect any change in the lifecycle of the storage pool. It should thus not be part of the storage pool lifecycle event set, but rather be a top level event in its own right. Thus we introduce VIR_STORAGE_POOL_EVENT_ID_REFRESH to replace it.