Every security driver has domainGenSecurityLabel defined.
Coverity complains about a possible leak of seclabel if
!sec_managers[i]-drv-domainGenSecurityLabel is true
and the seclabel might be overwritten by the next iteration
of the loop.
---
src/security/security_manager.c | 28
On 04/02/2014 06:44 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
Every security driver has domainGenSecurityLabel defined.
As currently written. But Dan wrote the manager to be flexible to
future drivers that omit obvious functions.
This patch makes sense for silencing Coverity, but I think it is
incomplete unless
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:00:09AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/02/2014 06:44 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
Every security driver has domainGenSecurityLabel defined.
As currently written. But Dan wrote the manager to be flexible to
future drivers that omit obvious functions.
This patch makes
On 04/02/2014 03:00 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/02/2014 06:44 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
Every security driver has domainGenSecurityLabel defined.
As currently written. But Dan wrote the manager to be flexible to
future drivers that omit obvious functions.
This patch makes sense for silencing
