Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] build: avoid strerror_r pitfalls

2011-05-25 Thread Eric Blake
On 05/24/2011 11:23 PM, Matthias Bolte wrote: > 2011/5/25 Eric Blake : >> In particular, this guarantees that virStrerror always gives a >> useful result. >> >> * .gnulib: Update to latest, for (lots of) strerror_r fixes. >> --- >> >> This patch removes the need for Daniel's proposal: >> https://ww

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] build: avoid strerror_r pitfalls

2011-05-24 Thread Matthias Bolte
2011/5/25 Eric Blake : > In particular, this guarantees that virStrerror always gives a > useful result. > > * .gnulib: Update to latest, for (lots of) strerror_r fixes. > --- > > This patch removes the need for Daniel's proposal: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-May/msg01236.html

[libvirt] [PATCH] build: avoid strerror_r pitfalls

2011-05-24 Thread Eric Blake
In particular, this guarantees that virStrerror always gives a useful result. * .gnulib: Update to latest, for (lots of) strerror_r fixes. --- This patch removes the need for Daniel's proposal: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-May/msg01236.html Now gnulib guarantees that strerror