On 03/30/2012 10:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:35:41AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> We are so close to a release that we don't want to pull in a
>> gnulib submodule update and risk regressions, since there has
>> been a lot of other gnulib churn upstream. However, th
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:35:41AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> We are so close to a release that we don't want to pull in a
> gnulib submodule update and risk regressions, since there has
> been a lot of other gnulib churn upstream. However, there are
> a couple of gnulib issues that are worth fixi
We are so close to a release that we don't want to pull in a
gnulib submodule update and risk regressions, since there has
been a lot of other gnulib churn upstream. However, there are
a couple of gnulib issues that are worth fixing in isolation,
by applying local patches to gnulib.
There was an