Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] build: improved handling of execinfo.h, BSD net/if.h

2012-09-06 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:39:28PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: FreeBSD and OpenBSD have a net/if.h that is not self-contained; and mingw lacks the header altogether. But gnulib has just taken care of that for us, so we might as well simplify our code. In the process, I got a syntax-check

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] build: improved handling of execinfo.h, BSD net/if.h

2012-09-06 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/06/2012 01:41 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:39:28PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: FreeBSD and OpenBSD have a net/if.h that is not self-contained; and mingw lacks the header altogether. But gnulib has just taken care of that for us, so we might as well simplify our

[libvirt] [PATCH] build: improved handling of execinfo.h, BSD net/if.h

2012-09-05 Thread Eric Blake
FreeBSD and OpenBSD have a net/if.h that is not self-contained; and mingw lacks the header altogether. But gnulib has just taken care of that for us, so we might as well simplify our code. In the process, I got a syntax-check failure if we don't also take the gnulib execinfo module. * .gnulib: