On 06/27/2011 09:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 05:16:33PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> We already have a public virDomainPinVcpu, which implies that
>> Pin and Vcpu are treated as separate words. Commit e261987c
>> introduced virDomainGetVcpupinInfo as the first public
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 05:16:33PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> We already have a public virDomainPinVcpu, which implies that
> Pin and Vcpu are treated as separate words. Commit e261987c
> introduced virDomainGetVcpupinInfo as the first public API
> that used Vcpupin, although we had prior internal
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:51:17 -0400
Laine Stump wrote:
> On 06/24/2011 07:16 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > We already have a public virDomainPinVcpu, which implies that
> > Pin and Vcpu are treated as separate words. Commit e261987c
> > introduced virDomainGetVcpupinInfo as the first public API
> > t
On 06/24/2011 07:16 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
We already have a public virDomainPinVcpu, which implies that
Pin and Vcpu are treated as separate words. Commit e261987c
introduced virDomainGetVcpupinInfo as the first public API
that used Vcpupin, although we had prior internal uses of that
spelling.
On 06/24/2011 05:16 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> We already have a public virDomainPinVcpu, which implies that
> Pin and Vcpu are treated as separate words. Commit e261987c
> introduced virDomainGetVcpupinInfo as the first public API
> that used Vcpupin, although we had prior internal uses of that
> sp
We already have a public virDomainPinVcpu, which implies that
Pin and Vcpu are treated as separate words. Commit e261987c
introduced virDomainGetVcpupinInfo as the first public API
that used Vcpupin, although we had prior internal uses of that
spelling. For consistency, change the spelling to be
