On 02/02/2012 06:10 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 02/02/2012 07:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Sometimes, its easier to run children with 2>&1 in shell notation,
>> and just deal with stdout and stderr interleaved. This was already
>> possible for fd handling; extend it to also work when doing string
>
On 02/02/2012 07:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Sometimes, its easier to run children with 2>&1 in shell notation,
and just deal with stdout and stderr interleaved. This was already
possible for fd handling; extend it to also work when doing string
capture of a child process.
* docs/internals/command
Sometimes, its easier to run children with 2>&1 in shell notation,
and just deal with stdout and stderr interleaved. This was already
possible for fd handling; extend it to also work when doing string
capture of a child process.
* docs/internals/command.html.in: Document this.
* src/util/command.
