On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:04:08AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 15:36:23 +, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > Memory-less numa nodes could be specified by setting the memory size to
> > > 0. Allow ommiting of t
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 15:36:23 +, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > Memory-less numa nodes could be specified by setting the memory size to
> > 0. Allow ommiting of the parameter completely to specify the same.
> >
> > Partially resolv
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> Memory-less numa nodes could be specified by setting the memory size to
> 0. Allow ommiting of the parameter completely to specify the same.
>
> Partially resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217144
Does this correc
Memory-less numa nodes could be specified by setting the memory size to
0. Allow ommiting of the parameter completely to specify the same.
Partially resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217144
---
docs/schemas/cputypes.rng | 12
src/conf/numa_co