On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 07:51:45PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 05:24:03PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
While reviewing Rich last patch I was afraid that virXPathNodeSet()
could return -1 when doing an evaluation failure. It is based on
xmlXPathEval() from
While reviewing Rich last patch I was afraid that virXPathNodeSet()
could return -1 when doing an evaluation failure. It is based on
xmlXPathEval() from libxml2 whose behaviour is to possibly return NULL
on XPath evaluation failure independantly of the kind of failure:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 05:24:03PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
While reviewing Rich last patch I was afraid that virXPathNodeSet()
could return -1 when doing an evaluation failure. It is based on
xmlXPathEval() from libxml2 whose behaviour is to possibly return NULL
on XPath evaluation
