Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] daemon: Allow overriding NOFILES ulimit for the daemon as well

2012-01-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:23:14PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 05.01.2012 11:50, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:16:32AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > >> One of my latest patches (d8db0f9690) created support for setting > >> the limit for the maximum of opened fi

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] daemon: Allow overriding NOFILES ulimit for the daemon as well

2012-01-05 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 05.01.2012 11:50, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:16:32AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> One of my latest patches (d8db0f9690) created support for setting >> the limit for the maximum of opened files by qemu user. However, >> since libvirtd keeps one FD opened per domai

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] daemon: Allow overriding NOFILES ulimit for the daemon as well

2012-01-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:16:32AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > One of my latest patches (d8db0f9690) created support for setting > the limit for the maximum of opened files by qemu user. However, > since libvirtd keeps one FD opened per domain (well, for qemu at least) > it will likely hit thi

[libvirt] [PATCH] daemon: Allow overriding NOFILES ulimit for the daemon as well

2012-01-05 Thread Michal Privoznik
One of my latest patches (d8db0f9690) created support for setting the limit for the maximum of opened files by qemu user. However, since libvirtd keeps one FD opened per domain (well, for qemu at least) it will likely hit this limit on huge scenarios. --- daemon/libvirtd.aug |1 + daemon/libv