Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] domain_conf: Drop ancient reservation of unit 7 in drive address

2019-09-11 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 9/10/19 3:05 PM, Ján Tomko wrote: On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:52:45AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: Introduced in v1.0.6~3, the idea was that unit 7 was reserved and couldn't be used by QEMU. Well, that limitation is long gone. How does "long gone" translate to our platform support

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] domain_conf: Drop ancient reservation of unit 7 in drive address

2019-09-10 Thread Ján Tomko
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:52:45AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: Introduced in v1.0.6~3, the idea was that unit 7 was reserved and couldn't be used by QEMU. Well, that limitation is long gone. How does "long gone" translate to our platform support matrix? Jano Signed-off-by: Michal

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] domain_conf: Drop ancient reservation of unit 7 in drive address

2019-09-10 Thread Daniel Henrique Barboza
On 8/28/19 6:52 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: Introduced in v1.0.6~3, the idea was that unit 7 was reserved and couldn't be used by QEMU. Well, that limitation is long gone. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik --- Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza src/conf/domain_conf.c | 6 -- 1

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] domain_conf: Drop ancient reservation of unit 7 in drive address

2019-09-10 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 8/28/19 11:52 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > Ping. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[libvirt] [PATCH] domain_conf: Drop ancient reservation of unit 7 in drive address

2019-08-28 Thread Michal Privoznik
Introduced in v1.0.6~3, the idea was that unit 7 was reserved and couldn't be used by QEMU. Well, that limitation is long gone. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik --- src/conf/domain_conf.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c