On 07/15/2011 10:36 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 15.07.2011 16:29, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/15/2011 07:58 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Right now it is possible to undefine an active interface, or
destroy inactive. This patch add some checking to these operations
to prevent this. Also fix test
Right now it is possible to undefine an active interface, or
destroy inactive. This patch add some checking to these operations
to prevent this. Also fix test driver.
---
src/interface/netcf_driver.c | 83 --
src/test/test_driver.c |5 +++
2
On 07/15/2011 07:58 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Right now it is possible to undefine an active interface, or
destroy inactive. This patch add some checking to these operations
to prevent this. Also fix test driver.
I'm inclined to NACK this on design principles (I haven't read the patch
On 15.07.2011 16:29, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/15/2011 07:58 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Right now it is possible to undefine an active interface, or
destroy inactive. This patch add some checking to these operations
to prevent this. Also fix test driver.
I'm inclined to NACK this on design
On 15.07.2011 16:45, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/15/2011 08:36 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On the other hand, if we don't support transient interfaces, then the
above analysis which works for domains would have to be adjusted for
interfaces, so you may have something to patch after all.
Well,
On 07/15/2011 08:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/15/2011 08:36 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On the other hand, if we don't support transient interfaces, then the
above analysis which works for domains would have to be adjusted for
interfaces, so you may have something to patch after all.
Well,
On 07/15/2011 08:48 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 15.07.2011 16:45, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/15/2011 08:36 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On the other hand, if we don't support transient interfaces, then the
above analysis which works for domains would have to be adjusted for
interfaces, so you
2011/7/15 Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com:
On 07/15/2011 08:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/15/2011 08:36 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On the other hand, if we don't support transient interfaces, then the
above analysis which works for domains would have to be adjusted for
interfaces, so you may
2011/7/15 Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com:
On 07/15/2011 08:48 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 15.07.2011 16:45, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/15/2011 08:36 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On the other hand, if we don't support transient interfaces, then the
above analysis which works for domains would
