On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 04:15:45PM -0500, Dave Allan wrote:
On 01/11/2010 06:53 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:50:17AM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Looks safe to me, assuming the kernel information are exported in the
same way,
Yes, it seems to be the same. Pushed
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 04:15:45PM -0500, Dave Allan wrote:
On 01/11/2010 06:53 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:50:17AM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Looks safe to me, assuming the kernel information are exported in the
same way,
Yes, it seems to be the same. Pushed
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:50:17AM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Looks safe to me, assuming the kernel information are exported in the
same way,
Yes, it seems to be the same. Pushed now.
Cheers,
-- Guido
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
On 01/11/2010 06:53 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:50:17AM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Looks safe to me, assuming the kernel information are exported in the
same way,
Yes, it seems to be the same. Pushed now.
Cheers,
-- Guido
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Hi,
attached patch looks for the DMI information in /sys/class since older
kernels (e.g. 2.6.26) have it there.
Cheers,
-- Guido
From: =?UTF-8?q?Guido=20G=C3=BCnther?= a...@sigxcpu.org
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:13:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Also look for dmi information in /sys/class
older kernels
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:35:36AM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi,
attached patch looks for the DMI information in /sys/class since older
kernels (e.g. 2.6.26) have it there.
Cheers,
-- Guido
From: =?UTF-8?q?Guido=20G=C3=BCnther?= a...@sigxcpu.org
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:13:51 +0100
