On 10/09/2013 04:10 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
We should absolutely be running
syntax-check as normal to identify that on -maint branches
just as on master.
IMHO all we want todo is add:
local-checks-to-skip += sc_copyright_check
When on -maint branches.
I agree. make
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:45:23PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Maintenance branches cherry-pick some, but not all patches, and
sometimes in different order, which means that 'make syntax-check'
is likely to fail for hard-to-predict reasons. Yet having a
common workflow makes it easier to switch
On 10/09/2013 03:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:45:23PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Maintenance branches cherry-pick some, but not all patches, and
sometimes in different order, which means that 'make syntax-check'
is likely to fail for hard-to-predict reasons. Yet
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 06:53:00AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/09/2013 03:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:45:23PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Maintenance branches cherry-pick some, but not all patches, and
sometimes in different order, which means that 'make
Maintenance branches cherry-pick some, but not all patches, and
sometimes in different order, which means that 'make syntax-check'
is likely to fail for hard-to-predict reasons. Yet having a
common workflow makes it easier to switch between branches. This
patch sets up a filter so that 'make