Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-03-10 Thread Claudio Bley
At Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:22:53 +0100, Claudio Bley wrote: > > At Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:18:21 +0100, > Michal Privoznik wrote: > > > > On 19.02.2014 13:03, Claudio Bley wrote: > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley > > > --- > > > OK, how about this patch? > > > > > > While at it, should I convert t

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-03-10 Thread Claudio Bley
At Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:18:21 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > On 19.02.2014 13:03, Claudio Bley wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley > > --- > > OK, how about this patch? > > > > While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to > > VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for consist

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-02-24 Thread Jim Fehlig
Claudio Bley wrote: > At Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:19:35 -0700, > Jim Fehlig wrote: > >> Claudio Bley wrote: >> >>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley >>> --- >>> OK, how about this patch? >>> >>> While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to >>> VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for con

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-02-24 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/19/2014 05:03 AM, Claudio Bley wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley > --- > OK, how about this patch? > > While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to > VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for consistency? Yes, making that conversion as a separate patch for consistency wou

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-02-24 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 19.02.2014 13:03, Claudio Bley wrote: Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley --- OK, how about this patch? While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for consistency? src/esx/esx_driver.c |2 +- src/openvz/openvz_driver.c |2 +- sr

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-02-21 Thread Claudio Bley
At Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:19:35 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > Claudio Bley wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley > > --- > > OK, how about this patch? > > > > While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to > > VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for consistency? > > > > src/esx/esx_driv

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-02-20 Thread Jim Fehlig
Claudio Bley wrote: > Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley > --- > OK, how about this patch? > > While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to > VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for consistency? > > src/esx/esx_driver.c |2 +- > src/openvz/openvz_driver.c |2 +- > src/phyp/ph

[libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-02-19 Thread Claudio Bley
Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley --- OK, how about this patch? While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for consistency? src/esx/esx_driver.c |2 +- src/openvz/openvz_driver.c |2 +- src/phyp/phyp_driver.c |2 +- src/qemu/q