On 05/15/2015 11:13 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 05/15/2015 05:35 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 14.05.2015 21:38, Laine Stump wrote:
>>> The kernel won't complain if you set the mac address and vlan tag for
>>> an SRIOV VF via its PF, and it will even let you assign the PF to a
>>> guest using P
On 15.05.2015 17:13, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 05/15/2015 05:35 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 14.05.2015 21:38, Laine Stump wrote:
>>> The kernel won't complain if you set the mac address and vlan tag for
>>> an SRIOV VF via its PF, and it will even let you assign the PF to a
>>> guest using PCI
On 05/15/2015 05:35 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 14.05.2015 21:38, Laine Stump wrote:
>> The kernel won't complain if you set the mac address and vlan tag for
>> an SRIOV VF via its PF, and it will even let you assign the PF to a
>> guest using PCI device assignment or macvtap passthrough. But
On 14.05.2015 21:38, Laine Stump wrote:
> The kernel won't complain if you set the mac address and vlan tag for
> an SRIOV VF via its PF, and it will even let you assign the PF to a
> guest using PCI device assignment or macvtap passthrough. But if the
> PF isn't online, the device won't be usable
The kernel won't complain if you set the mac address and vlan tag for
an SRIOV VF via its PF, and it will even let you assign the PF to a
guest using PCI device assignment or macvtap passthrough. But if the
PF isn't online, the device won't be usable in the guest. This patch
makes sure that it is t
