On 02.04.2014 01:39, Eric Blake wrote:
The phyp code claims that it wants a non-zero value, but actually
enforces a capacity of zero. It has been this way since commit
ebc46fe in June 2010. Bummer that it has my name as the committer
- I guess I should have been much more stubborn about not
On 04/02/14 01:39, Eric Blake wrote:
The phyp code claims that it wants a non-zero value, but actually
enforces a capacity of zero. It has been this way since commit
ebc46fe in June 2010. Bummer that it has my name as the committer
- I guess I should have been much more stubborn about not
On 04/02/2014 03:49 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 04/02/14 01:39, Eric Blake wrote:
The phyp code claims that it wants a non-zero value, but actually
enforces a capacity of zero. It has been this way since commit
ebc46fe in June 2010. Bummer that it has my name as the committer
- I guess I
The phyp code claims that it wants a non-zero value, but actually
enforces a capacity of zero. It has been this way since commit
ebc46fe in June 2010. Bummer that it has my name as the committer
- I guess I should have been much more stubborn about not blindly
taking someone else's 1600-line