Eric Blake wrote:
> From: Roman Bogorodskiy
>
> FreeBSD (and maybe other BSDs) have different member
> names in struct ifreq when compared to Linux, such as:
>
> - uses ifr_data instead of ifr_newname for setting
>interface names
> - uses ifr_index instead of ifr_ifindex for interface
>
From: Roman Bogorodskiy
FreeBSD (and maybe other BSDs) have different member
names in struct ifreq when compared to Linux, such as:
- uses ifr_data instead of ifr_newname for setting
interface names
- uses ifr_index instead of ifr_ifindex for interface
index
Also, add a check for SIOCGI
On 04/29/2013 11:48 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/27/2013 09:50 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
>> FreeBSD (and maybe other BSDs) have different member
>> names in struct ifreq when compared to Linux, such as:
>>
>> - uses ifr_data instead of ifr_newname for setting
>>interface names
>> - uses i
On 04/27/2013 09:50 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> FreeBSD (and maybe other BSDs) have different member
> names in struct ifreq when compared to Linux, such as:
>
> - uses ifr_data instead of ifr_newname for setting
>interface names
> - uses ifr_index instead of ifr_ifindex for interface
>
FreeBSD (and maybe other BSDs) have different member
names in struct ifreq when compared to Linux, such as:
- uses ifr_data instead of ifr_newname for setting
interface names
- uses ifr_index instead of ifr_ifindex for interface
index
Also, add a check for SIOCGIFHWADDR for virNetDevValid