We were using the libvirt release version (like 0.9.11) and not
the configure version (which for stable releases is 0.9.11.X)
Most other places got this right so hopefully that's all the fallout
from the version format change :)
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com
---
On 04/27/2012 10:59 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
We were using the libvirt release version (like 0.9.11) and not
the configure version (which for stable releases is 0.9.11.X)
Most other places got this right so hopefully that's all the fallout
from the version format change :)
Signed-off-by:
On 04/27/2012 02:06 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/27/2012 10:59 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
We were using the libvirt release version (like 0.9.11) and not
the configure version (which for stable releases is 0.9.11.X)
Most other places got this right so hopefully that's all the fallout
from the
