On 02/27/2013 01:14 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 27.02.2013 04:08, Eric Blake wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896092 mentions that
>> qemu 1.4 and earlier only accept a simple start-stop range for
>> the cpu=... argument of -numa. Libvirt would attempt to use
>> -numa cpu
On 27.02.2013 04:08, Eric Blake wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896092 mentions that
> qemu 1.4 and earlier only accept a simple start-stop range for
> the cpu=... argument of -numa. Libvirt would attempt to use
> -numa cpu=1,3 for a disjoint range, which did not work as inten
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896092 mentions that
qemu 1.4 and earlier only accept a simple start-stop range for
the cpu=... argument of -numa. Libvirt would attempt to use
-numa cpu=1,3 for a disjoint range, which did not work as intended.
Upstream qemu will be adding a new syntax
