On 10/20/20 12:07 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Currently all errors from qemuInterfacePrepareSlirp() are completely
ignored by the callers. The intention is that missing qemu-slirp binary
should cause the caller to fallback to the built-in slirp impl.
Many of the possible errors though
Currently all errors from qemuInterfacePrepareSlirp() are completely
ignored by the callers. The intention is that missing qemu-slirp binary
should cause the caller to fallback to the built-in slirp impl.
Many of the possible errors though should indeed be considered fatal.
Signed-off-by: Daniel
On 12/10/19 7:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The use of the parseOpaque parameter was mistakenly removed in
>
> commit 4a4132b4625778cf80acb9c92d06351b44468ac3
> Author: Daniel P. Berrangé
> Date: Tue Dec 3 10:49:49 2019 +
>
> conf: don't use passed in caps in post parse
The use of the parseOpaque parameter was mistakenly removed in
commit 4a4132b4625778cf80acb9c92d06351b44468ac3
Author: Daniel P. Berrangé
Date: Tue Dec 3 10:49:49 2019 +
conf: don't use passed in caps in post parse method
causing the method to re-fetch qemuCaps that were
Hi Michal,
Replying to an old thread:
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> I think this patch enables exactly that. The VM admins don't start the
> domains by hand but probably have some SW that starts configured domains
> whenever not running. E.g. if one domain crashes,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 03:55:19PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 08/10/2017 04:02 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:36:27AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476866
For some reason, we completely ignore setting for
domains.
On 08/10/2017 04:02 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:36:27AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476866
>>
>> For some reason, we completely ignore setting for
>> domains. The implementation is simply not there. It never was.
>>
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:36:27AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476866
For some reason, we completely ignore setting for
domains. The implementation is simply not there. It never was.
However, things are slightly more complicated. QEMU sends us
On 08/03/2017 06:38 PM, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am 03.08.2017 um 09:36 schrieb Michal Privoznik:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476866
>>
>> For some reason, we completely ignore setting for
>> domains. The implementation is simply not there. It never was.
>> However,
Hello,
Am 03.08.2017 um 09:36 schrieb Michal Privoznik:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476866
>
> For some reason, we completely ignore setting for
> domains. The implementation is simply not there. It never was.
> However, things are slightly more complicated. QEMU sends us two
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476866
For some reason, we completely ignore setting for
domains. The implementation is simply not there. It never was.
However, things are slightly more complicated. QEMU sends us two
RESET events on domain reboot. Fortunately, the event contains
11 matches
Mail list logo